[Breaking] Prashant Bhushan Contempt: SC To Pronounce Orders Tomorrow On Whether To Accept His Explanation In 2009 Case

first_imgTop Stories[Breaking] Prashant Bhushan Contempt: SC To Pronounce Orders Tomorrow On Whether To Accept His Explanation In 2009 Case LIVELAW NEWS NETWORK9 Aug 2020 9:34 AMShare This – xThe Supreme Court will pronounce orders tomorrow on whether to accept the explanation tendered by Advocate Prashant Bhushan in the contempt case taken against him in 2009.On August 4, a bench comprising Justices Arun Mishra, B R Gavai and Krishna Murari had reserved orders on whether to accept his explanation and said that it will proceed to hear the case in detail if his explanation was…Your free access to Live Law has expiredTo read the article, get a premium account.Your Subscription Supports Independent JournalismSubscription starts from ₹ 599+GST (For 6 Months)View PlansPremium account gives you:Unlimited access to Live Law Archives, Weekly/Monthly Digest, Exclusive Notifications, Comments.Reading experience of Ad Free Version, Petition Copies, Judgement/Order Copies.Subscribe NowAlready a subscriber?LoginThe Supreme Court will pronounce orders tomorrow on whether to accept the explanation tendered by Advocate Prashant Bhushan in the contempt case taken against him in 2009.On August 4, a bench comprising Justices Arun Mishra, B R Gavai and Krishna Murari had reserved orders on whether to accept his explanation and said that it will proceed to hear the case in detail if his explanation was not found acceptable.”In case we do not accept the explanation/apology, we will hear the matter. We reserve the order”, the bench noted in the order.During the hearing, the bench had asked Senior Advocate Rajeev Dhavan, Bhushan’s counsel, if he was willing to apologize.As per the press release issued by Prashant Bhushan’s office,  he refused to tender an apology but agreed to issue the explanation. “In my interview to Tehelka in 2009 I have used the word corruption in a wide sense meaning lack of propriety. I did not mean only financial corruption or deriving any pecuniary advantage. If what I have said caused hurt to any of them or to their families in any way, I regret the same. I unreservedly state that I support the institution of the judiciary and especially the Supreme Court of which I am a part, and had no intention to lower the prestige of the judiciary in which I have complete faith. I regret if my interview was misunderstood as doing so, that is, lower the reputation of the judiciary, especially the Supreme Court, which could never have been my intention at all.”The suo moto case was taken on the basis of a complaint made by Senior Advocate Harish Salve. The contempt proceedings pertain to allegations made by Salve towards Bhushan where Bhushan allegedly said that half of the last 16 Chief Justices were corrupt. As per the complaint, Bhushan also said in the interview that he had no proof for the allegations. The complaint was filed by Salve through an interlocutory application filed in the Sterlite case, in which he was the Amicus Curiae. On November 6, 2009, the complaint was placed before a bench comprising the then Chief Justice K G Balakrishnan and Justice S H Kapadia, which directed that the matter be listed before a 3-judge bench in which Justice Kapadia was not a member. On January 19, 2010, a bench comprising Justices Altamas Kabir, Cyriac Joseph and H L Dattu issued notices to Bhushan and Tarun Tejpal, the Editor-in-Chief of Tehelka magazine.Subscribe to LiveLaw, enjoy Ad free version and other unlimited features, just INR 599 Click here to Subscribe. All payment options available.loading….Next Storylast_img read more