Cedar County authorities in Nebraska are asking for the public’s help in locating 44-year-old Kevin Robert Haug, previously of Fordyce, Nebraska.Haug is wanted in connection with an alleged early morning knife attack Tuesday in Cedar County.He may be located in the Yankton or Brookings, South Dakota, area.Haug is accused of felony Attempted Murder in the First Degree; Assault in the First Degree; Burglary; Use of a Deadly Weapon to Commit a Felony; and Possession of a Deadly Weapon to Commit a Felony.Court documents state that Haug attacked 58-year-old James Olson at Haug’s wife’s Fordyce residence with a pair of knives.Haug’s daughter told police that her father had broken into the home and she found him hiding inside around 4am.Olson was taken to a Yankton hospital by ambulance with several stab wound injuries.Cedar County Attorney Ed Matney cautions that “Members of the public should not approach Haug. Instead, they should contact law enforcement right away.”
An intercomparison of zenith-sky UV-visible spectrometers was held at Camborne, UK, for 2 weeks in September 1994. Eleven instruments participated, from nine different European institutes which were involved with the Second European Stratospheric Arctic and Mid-latitude Experiment (SESAME) campaign. Four instruments were of the Systeme d’Analyse d’Observations Zénithales (SAOZ) type, while the rest were particular to the institutes involved. The results showed that the SAOZ instruments were consistent to within 3% (10 DU) for ozone and 5% for NO2. For ozone the results from these instruments agreed well with total ozone measurements by Dobson and Brewer spectrophotometers and integrated ozonesondes when the air mass factors for the SAOZ were calculated using the ozonesonde profiles. Differences of up to 10% in ozone and 30% in NO2 were found between different instruments. In some cases these differences are attributable to the different absorption cross sections used in the analysis of the spectra, but other discrepancies remain to be investigated. A prominent source of error identified in the campaign was uncertainty in the derivation of the amount of absorber in the reference spectrum, which can contribute an error of up to 3% (10 DU) in ozone and 1.5×1014 molecules cm−2 in NO2.